|

Fall 2009
Northeast
Crop condition ratings for
corn, soybeans, and hay are much better this year
than last in Ohio and Pennsylvania, but not quite
as good in Michigan. In Ontario and Quebec, the
growing season has been cool and rainy, with difficult
harvests for hay and wheat. The month of July was
particularly cool, setting several records. Ontario
corn tasseling and silking has been delayed to
early August, raising concerns about the crop maturing
on time.
Ontario winter wheat yielded 5
to 10 bu/A below past averages, and varied from 40
to 135 bu/A. According to the 6 August Ontario Field
Crop Report by OMAFRA Field Crop Specialists, “drainage,
planting date and seed-placed phosphorus fertilizer
are the three key elements responsible for these
yield disparities.”
Prices this past spring led many
to cut back on fertilizer use, particularly for K.
Consequences may or may not have shown up in this
year’s crop, but will eventually impact soil
test levels and the performance of future crops.
Have a look at the IPNI article — What
Are the Consequences of Not Maintaining Soil Potassium? — for
details.
Soon, forage plants will enter
the critical fall growth period, during which they
store the carbohydrates they need to survive the
winter. Adequate K is essential for this carbohydrate
storage. August is an excellent time to apply K fertilizers.
Potassium is particularly likely to run short if
previous harvests have been heavy. The amount to
apply is an important decision. Make sure it’s
based on a recent soil test. It’s also helpful
to look at the analysis results for K if you’ve
sent forage from earlier cuts this year to the lab.
Calculating a nutrient budget – nutrients removed
by previous harvests minus the amounts supplied in
manures and fertilizers – can also help determine
the right amount to replace. For harvested cereals
underseeded to forage, K should have been supplied
at planting, but if it wasn't, applying as soon as
possible after cereal harvest will ensure the seedlings
develop into winter-hardy plants.
Manure applications following harvests
of cereals and silage corn should be guided by soil
tests and manure nutrient analysis. Rates should
be appropriate to supply the soil's needs for P,
K, and organic matter. Avoid wasting N by ensuring
a cover crop grows to absorb what is released from
the manure.
Northcentral
In the eastern part of the Corn
Belt, early season wet conditions caused a very rushed
planting season. There are many reports of uneven stands
and uneven growth rates of corn within fields. Nitrogen
deficiencies have also been observed in several places,
probably caused in part by the very wet spring conditions.
This year is a perfect one to make an end of season
N nutrition evaluation using the stalk nitrate test.
This is the only test available that can determine
if corn was properly nourished with N during the past
season. Such information can help refine N management
programs next year. Soil testing will also be paramount
this fall and or next spring, since many cutbacks in
P and K were made.
Northern Great Plains
- Managing Nutrients in Times of Challenging Weather
It is well understood that weather has the dominant
effect on crop growth and yield as it affects moisture supply and timing,
and growing degree units to allow crop growth and ripening. A grower can
prepare and execute management of a crop very well, but if moisture is limited
and drought occurs there will be lower than expected crop yields. Also, if
temperatures are lower than normal, crops may be slow to germinate and emerge,
and will progress through growth stages slower than normal. They may mature
slowly and not be ready for harvest as early as usual.
The 2009 crop season in the Northern Great Plains (NGP) started
off with a delayed spring due to cooler than normal temperatures during March,
April, and May. This delayed planting of spring-seeded crops, and has delayed
the growth and maturation of fall-seeded wheat. The moisture received over
the NGP region (the states of Montana, North Dakota, and the provinces of Manitoba,
Saskatchewan, and Alberta) has been patchy. Some areas have had adequate moisture
for above normal crop growth, some areas were so wet during planting of spring
crops that planting was delayed and in some cases not possible. In other areas,
the spring weather was not only cooler than normal, but very dry. Crops were
planted into seedbeds with marginal moisture for germination and emergence,
the result was that crop emergence was poor, substandard plant stands initially
emerged. Then when later precipitation was received, a second or even a third
wave of crop germination and emergence occurred, causing crop stands of various
stages of maturity. This means that crop yields and time of maturity and ripening
is unusually variable over the NGP.
It is important to take into account the type of growing
season received when planning next year’s crops. In most cases, growers
plan for an average to somewhat above average yielding crop and manage the
plant nutrient supplies accordingly. However, in such a variable weather
year it is important to understand what happened in your local area and adapt
next year’s fertilizer plans based on this year’s weather and
crop growth. When above average crop growth is experienced, nutrient levels
in the soil are somewhat drawn down and usually necessitate greater than
normal fertilizer inputs the following year. Conversely, when moisture and
heat is limited, crop growth is less than normal, and more nutrients remain
as residual in the soil – usually meaning some reductions in fertilizer
inputs the next year. Fortunately for those growers who have experienced
an average growing season with ample but not excessive moisture and heat,
crop yields will be close to average and levels of residual nutrients will
also be near normal. Chances are, fertilizer applications the next year will
be close to average for the area farmed.
Whether a grower has had an above average, below average,
or average crop yielding year, one of the best methods to determine residual
nutrients in the soil is to have soil samples taken and analyzed. This can
be done in the fall or spring, but fall soil sampling allows more time for
planning and deciding what rates of nutrients to apply in the fertilizer blends
for next year’s crop. By changing fertilizer rates, whether up or down
from average amounts, a grower can better supply the needed amount, thus avoiding
over or under fertilization.
Southern/Central Great Plains
This has been another season of extremes across the
Southern and Central Great Plains region. The southern part of the region,
in particular south and central Texas, is in the midst of serious drought
and high temperatures, while to the north the moisture and crop conditions
are somewhat better. The latest Drought Severity Index shows southern Texas
in extreme drought and much of Nebraska as extremely moist.
Preparation for winter wheat planting is well underway.
As we move toward the fall season, m ake sure appropriate early wheat fertility
is in place to take advantage of the relatively good soil moisture conditions
in parts of the region. Remember that wheat is very responsive to P fertilizer
and that adequate early season P helps set ultimate yield potential. Soil
test data, field history, and consultation with local professionals can help
establish appropriate P rates. Also, make sure that enough N is available
early in the season. While large amounts of N are not required in the early
stages of growth, adequate amounts are essential for development and setting
the stage for the remainder of the season. Where N is short early in the
season, root development can be severely hindered, resulting in negative
consequences for the remainder of the season. Ultimately the best N rate
and timing decisions are region and field specific, but a general equation
for N rate for winter wheat grain production is [ (Yield goal x 2.4) - (NO3-N
lb/A 2 ft.) - (10 x %OM)].
Southeast
In the last update, the topic was
using precision agriculture technologies to address spatial variability
in fields. What wasn’t addressed was why it is so important to consider
sources of variability in fields when making nutrient management decisions.
Precision agriculture is not just about gadgets. For example, growers have
had yield monitors on their combines for over a decade, but it hasn’t
been nearly that long ago that they started using yield maps to define
management zones in their fields and treat them differently. Precision
agriculture is a mindset and a way of thinking about crop production that
goes beyond the big picture and focuses on details.
One of the projects that the IPNI Spatial and Temporal
Variability work group initiated this year was a "Top Ten" list
of reasons why understanding variability is important when making nutrient
management decisions. The work group (representing China, India, and North
and South America) wanted to share different perspectives and feedback
from production systems around the world to define a global set of topics
that will be the focus for a series of deliverables to be developed over
the next couple of years.
Counting down, the list looked like this:
Understanding spatial and temporal variability is important…
10) to guide technology development
9) for more accurate modeling
8) for cropping system sustainability
7) to guide nutrient management legislation
6) to maximize productivity
5) to maximize profit
4) to minimize environmental impact
3) because this year is not last year
2) to develop nutrient recommendation systems at the appropriate scale
1) for making the right management decision
The first product developed was a slide set presented
at the recent InfoAg 2009 conference by Dr. Steve Phillips, Southeast Region
Director. The talk was recorded and published by a precision agriculture
website and can be heard at http://www.precisionpays.com/2009/07/infoag-talk-understand-nutrient-variability/.
Finally, a reminder that the 2009 Southern Plant
Nutrient Management Conference will be held in Olive Branch, Mississippi,
on October 6-7, 2009. This year, we will feature a session on nutrient
drawdown on southern soils. Presentations will be given by university
scientists discussing the effect over time of reducing or eliminating
P or K fertilizer applications on soil test nutrient levels and rice,
soybean, wheat, and corn grain yields. Certified crop advisers are encouraged
to attend all of the sessions on Tuesday afternoon and Wednesday morning
for extra (CEUs) in soil fertility and plant nutrition. The site of the
conference will again be The Whispering Woods Hotel and Conference Center, http://www.wwconferencecenter.com.
A block of hotel rooms has been arranged at the hotel, under the name “Southern
Plant Nutrient Management Conference”. Conference registration
will remain the same at last year – US$50, payable upon arrival.
West
It will be a relief to get to the harvest season this year.
There have been plenty of uncertainties related to crop prices compared with
last year. Additional concern about water availability and fluctuating input
prices have also contributed to uncertainty. Similar to a football team, focusing
on basic fundamentals usually brings the best results. Flashy plays and quick
maneuvers are occasionally effective for the football team, but without consistent
performance the team will not be playing well at the end of the season.
The fundamental steps for a successful harvest begin with
maintaining an adequate nutrient supply to nourish the crop. There are no substitutes
to this basic foundation! During harvest, consider the quantity of nutrients
that are being removed from the field and how best to replenish this nutrient
reservoir this fall or spring. If you want to reconsider your current practices,
consult with a Certified Crop Adviser to determine the Right Source, Right
Rate, Right Time, and Right Place for your specific fertilizer practices. While
headed for harvest this fall, keep your eye on the fundamentals to maintain
success.
|
|